Which routing method enables seamless access between different subnets?

The choice of using static routing for seamless access between different subnets is based on its features that provide predictable and straightforward network management. Static routing involves manually configuring the routes in a network, which allows for explicit control over the routing decisions made by the network devices.

When you set up static routes between subnets, you define the specific paths that data packets should take to travel from one subnet to another. This ensures that packets consistently follow the same route, making it easier to troubleshoot connectivity issues and ensuring predictable performance. As a result, static routing can be particularly effective in smaller networks where the overhead of dynamic routing protocols would be unnecessary or where the network topology is stable and does not change frequently.

Dynamic routing, while capable of adapting to changes in the network, requires more resources and configuration to manage automated route updates. Policy-based routing allows for routing decisions based on various criteria other than the destination address, which can add complexity. Default routing forwards packets to a predetermined next hop when no specific route is found, but it does not provide the granular control that static routing offers across different subnets.

In summary, static routing is beneficial for ensuring reliable and straightforward access between different subnets due to its direct path definition and stability, making it the preferred routing