Which of the following is a potential consequence of disabling outdated protocols like TLS 1.1?

Disabling outdated protocols such as TLS 1.1 can lead to access issues for dependent applications because many applications may still rely on these older protocols for secure communication. If TLS 1.1 is disabled and the application has not been updated to support newer protocols like TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3, those applications may fail to establish connections to servers that no longer support outdated options.

Maintaining legacy protocols can sometimes be necessary for compatibility with older systems or applications that have not undergone updates. Therefore, while upgrading to newer protocols enhances security by providing stronger encryption and better protection against attacks, it can inadvertently create accessibility challenges for applications that are incompatible with the latest security standards.

In contrast, options like increased loading times or reduced server costs are less likely to be direct consequences of disabling outdated protocols, as the primary focus of such an action is on security and compatibility rather than performance or cost. Additionally, improved security measures are indeed a benefit of disabling older protocols, but they do not highlight the potential negative impact on application access, which is why the correct answer emphasizes access issues.